U.S. Tightens
Missile Shield Encirclement Of China And Russia
By Rick Rozoff
So far this year the United States has succeeded in
inflaming tensions with China and indefinitely holding up a new strategic arms
reduction treaty with Russia through its relentless pursuit of global
interceptor missile deployments.
On January 29 the White House confirmed the completion of a
nearly $6.5 billion weapons transfer to Taiwan which includes 200 advanced
Patriot anti-ballistic missiles. Earlier in the same month it was reported that
Washington is also to provide Taiwan with eight frigates which Taipei intends to
equip with the Aegis Combat System that includes the capacity for ship-based
Standard Missile-3 interceptors.
The Aegis sea-based component of the expanding U.S.
interceptor missile system already includes Japan, South Korea and Australia,
and with Taiwan added China would be justified in being apprehensive.
On February 28 the U.S. House and Senate foreign affairs
committees permitted the “sale to Taiwan of missiles, helicopters and ships
valued at about $6.4 billion” despite weeks of protests from China. “The U.S.
Defense Department wants to sell Taiwan the most advanced Patriot anti-missile
system….The system, valued at $2.8 billion, would add to Taiwan’s network of 22
missile sites around the country….” [1]
Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Qin Gang recently stated
“The responsibility for the current difficulties in China-U.S. relations
[belongs] completely to the U.S. side” for failing to recognize and respect
China’s “core interests.” [2]
If the proposed placement of U.S. missile shield components
in Poland, the Czech Republic, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Alaska and
elsewhere were explained by alleged missile threats emanating from Iran and
North Korea, the transfer of U.S. Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missiles
to Taiwan – and, as was revealed in January, 35 miles from Russian territory in
Poland – represents the crossing of a new threshold. The Patriots in Taiwan and
Poland and the land- and sea-based missiles that will follow them are intended
not against putative “rogue states” but against two major nuclear powers, China
and Russia.
The PAC-3, “one of the most comprehensive upgrade programs
ever undertaken on an American weapon system,” [3] is in theory a strictly
defensive anti-ballistic missile system, targeting cruise and tactical ballistic
missiles. However, it has seven times the range of its PAC-2 predecessor and
with plans for a yet further major upgrade, the Missile Segment Enhancement, its
operational capability will be doubled again. With a future range of some 300
kilometers, the PAC-3 would be able to intercept and destroy missiles over
Chinese and Russian territory.
The English-language government newspaper China Daily
published an article on February 22 called “China circled by chain of US
anti-missile systems,” which observed that “Quite a few military experts have
noted that Washington’s latest proposed weapon deal with Taiwan is the key part
of a US strategic encirclement of China in the East Asian region, and that the
missiles could soon have a footprint that extends from Japan to the Republic of
Korea and Taiwan.” [4]
The article cites a Chinese air force colonel and military
strategist as contending
that “China is in a crescent-shaped ring of encirclement.
The ring begins in Japan, stretches through nations in the South China Sea to
India, and ends in Afghanistan. Washington’s deployment of anti-missile systems
around China’s periphery forms a crescent-shaped encirclement.”
Regular Pentagon military exercises in Mongolia, the
Philippines, South Korea, Thailand and Cambodia as well as solidification of
military ties with the nations of the Indian subcontinent – Pakistan, India and
Bangladesh – are further cause for concern in Beijing.
The China Daily feature also quoted an expert in military
affairs at the Institute of Political Science and Law as saying “The US
anti-missile system in China’s neighborhood is a replica of its [the U.S.'s]
strategy in Eastern Europe against Russia. The Obama administration began to
plan for such a system around China after its project in Eastern Europe got
suspended.”
In fact the current U.S. administration has by no means
abandoned plans to surround Russia as well as China with a ring of interceptor
missile installations and naval deployments.
Last month’s revelations that Washington is going to
station land-based interceptors in Bulgaria and Romania were followed by a
report that in addition to the Patriot missile batteries that will be set up in
eastern Poland next month “The US is still looking to build missile silos in
northern Poland” and, even more alarming, “The US is also interested in building
longer-range missile silos near the Poland-Kaliningrad border. These would be
capable of shooting down missiles from as far as 5,500 kilometers away….” [5]
The distance between the capitals of Poland and Iran is
less than 4,000 kilometers, so American missiles with a range of 5,500
kilometers are designed for other purposes. They could take in a broad stretch
of Russia.
The above-cited Chinese feature noted in addition that “the
ring encircling China can also be expanded at any time in other
directions….Washington is hoping to sell India and other Southeast Asian
countries the Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC)-3 missile defense system.”
The U.S. has had Patriot interceptor missiles deployed in
Japan, South Korea and in Taiwan even before the planned delivery of 200 more to
the third state.
“Analysts say that China is closely monitoring US-India
missile defense cooperation since any integration of India into the US global
missile defense system would profoundly affect China’s security.” [6]
On February 24 Russian Lieutenant General Yevgeny Buzhinsky
was paraphrased by one of his nation’s main news agencies as stating “China
could strengthen its nuclear capability in response to U.S. global missile
defense plans.”
Indicative of what reaction U.S. missile shield deployments
in China’s neighborhood could provoke, he said: “At present, China has a very
limited nuclear potential, but my recent contacts with Chinese military
representatives indicate that if the United States deploys a global missile
defense system, in particular in the Far East, China will build up its offensive
capability.” [7]
In response to U.S. insistence on supplying Taiwan with
hundreds of Patriot missiles, Blackhawk helicopters and Harpoon missiles, on
February 23 the Pentagon announced that China had delivered on its pledge to
postpone military contacts with Washington by canceling scheduled exchanges,
including “a visit by Adm. Robert F. Willard, commander of U.S. Pacific Command,
and visits to the U.S. by China’s chief of the general staff, Chen Bingde, and a
Chinese regional commander.” [8]
A Russian commentary on March 2 placed the developments in
stark perspective. “The differences between the USA and China have gone so far
that some time ago Beijing announced that all contacts with Washington in this
field would be stopped….The visit to China by Pentagon Chief Robert Gates, which
was set for the first half of this year, is also put into question. Besides,
bilateral consultations on strategic security were also delayed on Beijing’s
initiative.” [9]
Another analysis from the same country added a historical
dimension to the burgeoning crisis in U.S.-China relations.
“This winter has been a cold one for China-US relations. So
many serious disagreements between the two countries have not surfaced
simultaneously for decades….In the past China and the US avoided taking harsh
measures against each other serially, but evidently things have changed beyond
recognition over the past several months.” [10]
As mentioned above, the U.S. is implementing plans to
replicate the interceptor encirclement of Russia in regards to China. China’s
sense of alarm and its government’s response, then, can be expected to parallel
those of Russia.
In late February Polish President Lech Kaczynski ratified a
Status of Forces Agreement for American troops to be based at the Patriot
missile battery near Russia’s Kaliningrad district.
All American and NATO claims to the contrary, “Poland’s
former Defense Minister Radoslaw Sikorski and the Polish president himself
earlier admitted that they are not concerned about threats from Iran, but they
are interested in establishing an ‘American umbrella’ above Poland, thus trying
to show that they see Russia as an aggressor and a threat to Poland.”
“According to the agreement, about 100 American soldiers
will service up to eight US Patriot missile launchers” [11] in an installation
that “will be equipped with elements allowing it to be integrated with the
Polish defense system.” [12]
Early last month General Nikolai Makarov, chief of Russia’s
General Staff, warned that American interceptor missile plans jeopardize his
nation’s national security and have sabotaged the finalization of a successor to
the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which has been in limbo since
December 5.
Makarov said of the U.S. project, “We view it very
negatively, because it could weaken our missile forces.” [13]
Echoing his fears over the fate of START talks, on February
19 Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said that Washington’s missile
project “in the most immediate sense” is negatively influencing negotiations on
a replacement to a Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. [14]
Five days later Konstantin Kosachev, head of the State Duma
committee for international relations, said “If the connection between the
strategic arms reduction treaty and missile defense is not exhaustively fixed by
the sides in preparing the treaty… this would automatically create obstacles for
subsequent ratification of the document in the State Duma and create additional
difficulties for further advance[s] in cutting strategic offensive weapons.”
[15]
The provocative decisions by the U.S. on missile
deployments in Poland, Romania and Bulgaria since the expiration of the START
last December lead to no other conclusion than the White House and the Pentagon
intend the indefinite postponement if not the aborting of any comprehensive
agreement to limit and reduce nuclear arms.
Russia’s permanent representative to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin,
has recently voiced the concern that the U.S. still plans to base anti-ballistic
missile facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic [16] in spite of statements
by President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates last September
17 that previous plans for both countries are being replaced by “stronger,
smarter, and swifter” deployments.
The U.S. has not substituted the missile encirclement of
Russia with that of China. It is conducting both simultaneously.
As it is doing so, the Pentagon announced on February 12
that “A U.S. high-powered airborne laser weapon shot down a ballistic missile in
the first successful test of a futuristic directed energy weapon, the U.S.
Missile Defense Agency said….” [17]
A Reuters report of the test launched from a base in
California over the Pacific Ocean, one which has been touted as finally
realizing the Ronald Reagan administration’s plans for the Strategic Defense
Initiative, popularly known as Star Wars, described its purpose: “The airborne
laser weapon is aimed at…providing the U.S. military with the ability to engage
all classes of ballistic missiles at the speed of light while they are in the
boost phase of flight.” [18]
One of weapon’s manufacturers, the Boeing Company, issued a
press release for the occasion which said in part: “This experiment marks the
first time a laser weapon has engaged and destroyed an in-flight ballistic
missile, and the first time that any system has accomplished it in the missile’s
boost phase of flight….The laser is the most powerful ever installed on an
aircraft….” [19]
Northrop Grumman, another partner in the project (Lockheed
Martin being the third), added: “While ballistic missiles like the one ALTB
[Airborne Laser Testbed] destroyed move at speeds of about 4,000 miles [6,500
km] per hour, they are no match for a superheated, high-energy laser beam racing
towards it at 670 million mph [one billion kph].” [20]
The Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency was no less
enthusiastic about the results, stating “The revolutionary use of directed
energy is very attractive for missile defence, with the potential to attack
multiple targets at the speed of light, at a range of hundreds of kilometres….”
[21]
The airborne laser weapon is mounted on a modified Boeing
747 commercial airliner. Its potential range is global.
Ten days later it was reported by the U.S. Army that the
High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility at the White Sands Missile Range in New
Mexico will receive a new laser weapon and “The Army may soon blast missiles out
of the sky with a laser beam.” The weapon contains “100-kilowatt lasers that can
rapidly heat a target, causing catastrophic events such as warhead explosions or
airframe failures.”
Pentagon officials said it has “successfully worked in the
laboratory and on the battlefield and now they want to begin shooting down
missiles with it.” [22]
Airborne laser anti-missile weapons will join the full
spectrum of land, sea, air and space interceptor missile components to envelope
the world with a system to neutralize other nations’ deterrence capacities and
prepare the way for conventional and nuclear first strikes.
Notes
>
1) Bloomberg News, March 1, 2010
2) Bloomberg News, March 2, 2010
3) Wikipedia
4) China Daily, February 22, 2010
5) Warsaw Business Journal, March 2, 2010
6) China Daily, February 22, 2010
7) Russian Information Agency Novosti, February 24, 2010
8) Stars and Stripes, February 25, 2010
9) Voice of Russia, March 2, 2010
10) Roman Tomberg, Collapse of the G-2 Myth, or Stalemate
in China-US Relations Strategic Culture Foundation, March 2, 2010
11) Russia Today, February 27, 2010
12) Polish Radio, February 28, 2010
13) Associated Press, February 9, 2010
14) Associated Press, February 19, 2010
15) Russian Information Agency Novosti, February 24, 2010
16) Voice of Russia, February 23, 2010
17) Reuters, February 12, 2010
18) Ibid
19) Defense News, February 12, 2010
20) Associated Press, February 13, 2010
21) The Guardian, February 12, 2010
22) MyStateline.com, February 22, 2010